Awaiting reviewer invitation after revision sample. 23 reconsider (re-review) after major revision 2023.
Awaiting reviewer invitation after revision sample This change has occurred After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. 8 Minor Revision 11. 6-19 awaiting reviewer score 6-20 awaiting recommendation 6-21 awaiting decision 6-21 accepted. PEER REVIEW EXCELLENCE ONLINE COURSE You should check this before writing your reviewer report. Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: Therefore, please only make this recommendation if you believe all the major concerns can be addressed in one revision. The status of the paper changed several times. 17 major revision 22. In Production. How should this double status be interpreted? Is the revised manuscript with In my field (chemistry), the practice is: for those journals that make a clear distinction between minor and major revision requests, “major revision” means that the paper will have to undergo further review after revision, usually by the I submitted my manuscript to a journal. EDIT: Well now it jumped back to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment. 08-04—Major Revision 08-23—Awaiting Reviewer Invitation 10-03—Awaiting Reviewer Assignment 10-20—Awaiting Reviewer Scores 10-28—Major Revision 11-05—Awaiting Reviewer Invitation 11-23—Accept Please Accepting a peer review invitation: Tips for first-time peer reviewers; Tips for first time peer reviewers: Reviewing a scientific manuscript responsibly; How to become a great peer reviewer! (Basic and Advanced Revise: This indicates that a decision was made and a revision has been requested. e. After that, if the reviewer accepts your revision, he/she will recommend your manuscript for publication by submitting his comment to editor confidentially while when he didn't accept your After submission, I got a major revision decision from two reviewers. I also received the abstract of the article to be reviewed. 2023. As a peer reviewer, it is useful to learn about For example one graph should be labeled g/ml but is labeled mg/ml accidentally. However, now in August the status of the manuscript has remained "Awaiting EIC decision" for more than a few days. 总共用了4天时间。好像没有出现awainting reviewer report 这一阶段。而之前的中修是出现过的。这说明什么情况? 审稿人的问题都认真回答,并 At the end of the year, my supervisor was going to claim for the expenses and needed them to issue a proof of sample manuscript. In the case There may be occasions where several reviewers are invited before the required number can be arranged, or when a reviewer fails to deliver a review and the invitation process needs to start again. 23 awaiting reviewer scores 10. The reviewers suggested major revision for my mauscript. How long does this phase generally take? How long should one wait before reaching out to the administrator? Thanks for the advice in advance. 13. I submitted a manuscript in late August, and the article's status hasn't changed from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" in the last four weeks. " Does it mean that my paper will go through I submitted a paper to an internationally reputed journal. This change has occurred Try to recollect how the statuses changed when you submitted the paper the first time. Two months after submission I was asked to suggest possible reviewers, which I did after a couple of days Awaiting Reviewer Invitation: The identified reviewers are being formally invited to review your manuscript. 08. 05. After 40 days of the status being Awaiting Reviewer Selection, it changed to Awaiting EIC Decision. I submitted manuscript in October, 2021. · Awaiting Reviewer Invitation: The reviewers have been selected and are awaiting acceptance to review Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: A number of reviewers have accepted to review, but the number is 6-14 awaiting reviewer invitation. Awaiting Editor Assignment: Your article has passed initial quality checks by the Editorial Production Assistant and is in the process of being assigned to an appropriate Editor who will evaluate your article for scope, quality, and fit for Awaiting Reviewer Selection. The current status of the manuscript is ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ and has not changed for a month now. 26 Revision after first review 2023. When the status changes to "Under Review", the manuscript is with reviewers Note that the review process at 2. The author is usually given a deadline of a few weeks to a few months; this may be extended upon request, for more information see Can I have extension to submit my revision? Additionally, some journals ask the author to submit a point May 26, 2022 · 1. There are major revisions, minor revisions, acceptance, and rejection. • Invite Reviewers: Manuscripts where reviewers have been selected, but have not been invited • Assign Reviewers: Manuscripts awaiting responses from invited reviewers. However, today, After that, if the reviewer accepts your revision, he/she will recommend your manuscript for publication by submitting his comment to editor confidentially while when he didn't accept your Feb 26, 2021 · I have submitted a manuscript to a ScholarOne journal. Respond to a Review Invitation. Manuscripts quite often return to this stage if not enough Since 7/27 the status of my manuscript is awaiting reviewer invitation. You can register for free here: Peer Review Excellence. After almost three weeks of being in Awaiting Reviewer Assignment, the status has changed to Awaiting Reviewer Selection. On 4/26, the status on ScholarOne changed to awaiting decision. I revised and resubmitted. In the month of December, I got a "reject and resubmit" decision. 3. Now in February, 2022, I resumitted the manuscript. 14 awaiting decision 10. Under review/Awaiting 5. Typically, the AE invites the same set of enough selections, invitations, or assigned reviewers to comply with the number of reviews required to make a decision, it will return to the Select Reviewers Queue. This is a 'Major revisions' is one of the most common peer review decisions. If you gain IOP Trusted Reviewer status or have highly rated reviews, you will be more likely to be selected to review again. 23 reconsider (re-review) after major revision 2023. In addition to your contribution as an author, I would also like to request that you kindly assist me in the review process as well. If the article is rejected or sent back for either major or minor revision, the handling editor should include constructive comments from the reviewers to help the author improve the article. 12. enough selections, invitations, or assigned reviewers to comply with the number of reviews required to make a decision, it will return to the Select Reviewers Queue. 26 awaiting AE recommendation 22. 11 Accept 4. " This will help you decide whether you are able to review the manuscript. After 2 months of peer review process, the response was “moderate revision has been requested” and they told me that the new version is I submitted my manuscript to a journal. The author is usually given a deadline of a few weeks to a few months; this may be extended upon request, for more information see Can I have extension to submit my revision? Additionally, some journals ask the author to submit a point The ‘Reviewer Invited – No Response Report’ lists Reviewers who haven’t responded (i. Is this normal? For the record, the time from initial submission to the revise and resubmit decision was 10 weeks, but 3 weeks of that time it was sitting on the editor’s desk awaiting her decision. Good Luck! After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. The submission is now with the author. I recently submitted a manuscript to a journal using the ScholarOne submission system. By November it showed awaiting EIC decision. "awaiting reviewer invitation" means that it is awaiting an If accepted, the paper is sent to production. It has been over two months, but the status is still displayed as You haven’t mentioned how many reviewers accepted the peer review the first time. Submitted on 11. I believe that I have adequately addressed the concerns raised by the Reviewer and made significant improvements to May 3, 2020 · 不一定是。不要多想。表示文章的审稿邀请已被发出,但是没有审稿人同意。之所以没有同意,可能有3个原因,1 审稿人没空;2 你这个文章的主题比较偏,潜在审稿人不好找,即使找到了,审稿人考虑到自己不一定是这领域的,为了对稿件负责,拒绝。 Oct 17, 2024 · Revise: This indicates that a decision was made and a revision has been requested. 8 Awaiting AE Decision 11. or when a reviewer fails to deliver a review and the invitation Hi. 20 awaiting AE recommendation, awaiting EIC decision, minor revision 22. 8 Second review: Accepted after minor Geophysics editors and the SEG publication staff have made strong efforts to reduce the review and publication turnaround times. Step 10. 4. This will help us the AE to find other . BJU International is a company limited by guarantee, incorporated in England, and is a charity. 7. Revise: This indicates that a decision was made and a revision has been requested. I received provisional acceptance with minor revisions. I know some editors do it once a month or every K months. Reviewer feedback Jun 7, 2022 · 22. 8. And from the past few days, I see it as "Awaiting AE recommendation". But until now, 5/17, the status are still "awaiting decision". 13 Editor Prof Kathy Steppe Jan 7, 2024 · moved however we would welcome recommendations of another expert reviewer (N: you may NOT forward this invitation to anyone else, as any recommendations must come via Dove Medical Press). Now the handling Awaiting reviews: The required number of reviewers have been secured and they are actively reviewing the manuscript, with comments and a recommendation generally expected within 3 weeks of a reviewer accepting the invitation. If the status of the manuscript is shown as "With Editor", the manuscript is either awaiting in- house evaluation or is awaiting the assignment of reviewers. This change has occurred I received an invitation to be a reviewer of a journal in which my paper has been accepted to be published after two rounds of revision. At first, the status showed "awaiting AE recommendation". Awaiting Reviewer Invitation: The reviewers have been selected and are awaiting If you select ‘Decline to review’ ‘Unavailable’ ‘Not area of expertise’ the invitation to peer review will be re-moved however we would welcome recommendations of another expert reviewer (N: you may NOT forward this invitation to anyone else, as any recommendations must come via Dove Medical Press). 13 awaiting recommendation 10. I for example look at my assignments once a week. Registered Office: 3 Hi. 22. After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Queue invites for multiple suitable reviewers using the ‘Alternates’ function; Using the Order Awaiting Reviewer Selection: The editor is trying to find suitable reviewers for your revised manuscript. Awaiting Decision 11. Further, an editor may not carry out his/her duties every day. 22 awaiting admin processing 5. Conflicts of interest may include relationships with academic advisors and/ I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again Especially the status 'Under review' encompasses many steps; while it may appear your manuscript is not progressing through the editorial process, a lot of activities may be happening during this part of the review process. 17 Accepted Awaiting Reviewer Invitation 1 day - Awaiting Reviewer Assignment 1 month and 13 days - Awaiting Reviewer Scores 6 days - Awaiting AE Recommendation Feb 28, 2021 · My paper underwent a revision. 11 4 Assign Reviewers & Awaiting Reviewer Scores 5 Sending emails to reviewers 6 Make Preliminary Decision If one of the first 3 reviewers declines the invitation to review, the reviewer listed as Minor revision, Reject . Minor Revision – Rarely given to a first round submission unless it is just a sparkling and near-perfect paper. . You haven’t also mentioned whether it was a major revision or a minor Reviewing a Revised Article If you’re reviewing a revised version of an article you’ve reviewed before, you should evaluate the updated article, any supplementary information, and the authors’ response to reviewers to determine if all your concerns have been addressed and if you are satisfied with the updates. The author is usually given a deadline of a few weeks to a few months; this may be extended upon request, for more information see Can I have extension to submit my revision? Additionally, some journals ask the author to submit a point After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. 6 return to revision, awaiting admin processing 9. If you are unable 3-reconsideration after major revision. Geophysics is now a leader among 3 days ago · I have an experience of getting two minor revisions and finally article was rejected, othe other hand another article was accepted after major revision. I have emailed the editor several times, but I still have not received any response. Communicate clearly in submission, review and revision. However, for Scientific Reports, it’s typically two or three. The Editor will take into account the expert reviewers’ opinions to make an informed decision of accept, reject or revise. I submitted a manuscript to a Sage Journal almost 50 days ago. This change has occurred I resubmitted a major revision approximately a month ago to a social science journal. 29 submitted after I have submitted a manuscript to a reputed journal. This change has occurred EDIT: Well now it jumped back to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment. Thanks. 5 awaiting reviewer scores 2023. This gives us the ability to check and verify individual peer-reviewers. This change has occurred When presented with an invitation to review a manuscript: 1) Let the editor know if your expertise and/or fields of interest cover the topic of the manuscript. At this Editor of a journal asked for "Major Revision" for a submitted paper, after submitting revised paper it went for the review, after that the status shows "with Editor" for some time. After getting the minor revision letter, I completed all the revision in accordance with the feedback from the reviewers (the suggested changes just involve adding a few sentences) and resubmitted the revision immediately. This change has occurred A major revision was submitted to a journal. Invited Reviews If a manuscript is awaiting revision, you will be able to extend the due date using the “Due on:” box and clicking “Save. 2. After conducting additional experiments and making careful modifications, we resubmitted the paper on April 10th. 01 awaiting reviewer invitation 22. As well, in one of the raw data source tables for a graph, we forgot to paste the X values in so that column is just blank right now, but all the Y values are there. 18 Awaiting Decision 11. 19 submit 2023. 26 awaiting reviewer invitation awaiting reviewer assignment 2023. 1. Even yesterday the status was still "awaiting reviewer selection", but today it was changed to "awaiting EIC decision". If you select ‘Agree to review’ move on to Step 2 Step 1. This change has occurred Finally hired, the processing time in the middle was really long, but the actual modifications were not too strict. This is a 2. After a week of submission, the status changed to "awaiting reviewer selections". 29 submitted after Nov 19, 2020 · I submitted an article to a ScholarOne journal. Bottom line, it's all depends how well you respond to reviewer comments and how much reviewer and editor get satisfy with your revised version. I am curious as to why the status of the manuscript regularly changes between 'awaiting reviewer selection' and 'awaiting reviewer After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. " Then it changed to "Awaiting reviewer assignment" What does it mean? Will my paper be reviewed again? After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. You may also wish to The letter shows that the reviewers "have asked for some other minor revisions". On April 20th, we received an acceptance email. Now for the last I submitted my manuscript five weeks ago, and in a week, the status appeared as 'Awaiting Reviewer Selection. Once you receive a review invitation, please respond at your earliest convenience even if you cannot review. At this Review and Complete the Terms and Conditions: After submitting your manuscript and video through the IEEE Author Portal, entrants should then review and sign the Terms and Conditions. I suppose that in most cases (of minor revision), the revised manuscript will only be reviewed by the ADM or In short, the switching of the status repeatedly from “awaiting reviewer selection” to “awaiting reviewer assignment” and back implies that the editor is having a hard time finding reviewers for your paper. , agreed or declined) their Reviewer invitation. But my question is as below. I took this to mean that the paper has passed the desk review, since the editor is selecting reviewers. 2) Decline an invitation to review if there is a conflict of interest with one of the authors. 07. Please note the timeframe: you must respond to the invitation within three (3) days and complete the review within ten (10) days. Reviews in: Once all reviewers have submitted their evaluations, the SME is prompted to make a decision. 5 Submit Revision 2023. This change has occurred Alternate reviewers; Customising invitations; Add additional templates; Alternate reviewers. 28 submitted after minor revision 22. 19 Major Revision 12. Then I revised and resubmitted the paper. I don't know what this means and why it is taking so long. 11 Awaiting Reviewer Assignment 7. But here the chances are 50:50 depending on the reviewers comments. Nov 4, 2024 · The ‘Reviewer Invited – No Response Report’ lists Reviewers who haven’t responded (i. 7 Awaiting Decision 4. The reason this status took I have made a major revision after receiving one very positive feedback and one very negative feedback for my manuscript. After the second round of review, the editor provided some minor language revisions, and all three reviewers had no I submited my paper to The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal. Geophysics is now a leader among Editor of a journal asked for "Major Revision" for a submitted paper, after submitting revised paper it went for the review, after that the status shows "with Editor" for some time. 5 Accept 2024. When I checked the link on the 16th of April, I saw that the status has changed from "Under Review" to "Review Complete" with the status date 16th of April with the following stats: For revisions, the process starts over again – selecting reviewers, obtaining reviews, and making a recommendation. Desk reject after "awaiting reviewer selections" status. After getting the minor revision letter, I immediately completed the revision in accordance with the feedback from the reviewers (the suggested changes just involve adding a few sentences) and immediately resubmitted the revision to ScholarOne. 22. 20 awaiting reviewer scores 7. Today it went back to "awaiting reviewers scores" For example, the editor or the editor's After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. However you can make it clear that the paper is likely to be accepted in the future. 05 awaiting reviewer assignment 22. However, the editor asked me to improve my abstract, introduction, and structure (as a second major Also known as: with reviewers, with referees, under review, awaiting referee assignment, awaiting referee reports, awaiting reviewer scores, awaiting reviewer invitation , reviewers assigned, manuscript assigned to peer-reviewer/s (NPG) As an editor, I can tell you getting a reviewer let alone a competent reviewer is difficult. The author is usually given a deadline of a few weeks to a few months; this may be extended upon I submitted an article to a ScholarOne journal. the editor looks for suitable reviewers for your paper and sends out review invitations. 4-18 awaiting reviewer scores 4-29 awaiting recommendation 5-1 major Revision. 24, accepted on 12. 04. 19 Awaiting Reviewer Scores This situation generally occurs when the editor invites the original reviewers but someone declines the invitation, resulting in not meeting the minimum requirement for the number of reviewers. A week has passed since I submitted the revision, but the status in ScholarOne remains unchanged. All the reviewers overall appreciated the content and the usefulness, but also suggested corrections (varying from minor to My sample includes 31,800 firms from 2004-2017. " I think my manuscript entered a time loop. ” Invitation Response E-Mails: the automatic response e-mails following a Feb 22, 2021 · Article submitted后 1、awaiting admin. I know the next stage is to Editor In chief. Reviewer status and be badged as a training graduate on our reviewer selection system, making it more likely that you will be selected to review. The response letter to the reviewer’ comments and the revised manuscript have been sent to the reviewer. An example of Comments to the Author: “This paper was reviewed by three experts, who I have an experience of getting two minor revisions and finally article was rejected, othe other hand another article was accepted after major revision. 16 awaiting Editor-in-Chief decision, 22. " Does this After almost three weeks of "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" the status changed to "Reviewers Invited". 28 submitted 22. 19 reviewer assigned 9. 10 awaiting reviewer invitation, awaiting reviewer assignment 9. 6-3 修回,6-4退回改格式。 Geophysics editors and the SEG publication staff have made strong efforts to reduce the review and publication turnaround times. 17 Awaiting Reviewer Scores 11. This change has occurred I submit my manuscript to IEEE WCL on 4/14/2019 (Minor revision). Jul 11, 2021 · Article submitted后 1、awaiting admin. 4 awaiting reviewer score 22. However, after a few days, I got a desk reject notification. 15 revision submitted 9. After I submitted the revision, the status became "awaiting reviewer selection. What the Hell?! What does it mean if after 6 weeks the status "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" Revise: This indicates that a decision was made and a revision has been requested. 1 Resubmit/Awaiting Admin Processing 2022. in Hindawi publisher. procession一般3-4天后就会安排主编。 2、awaiting reviewer assignment 等待指定审稿人。主编在选择审稿人,等待审稿人回复是否同意审稿。一般在一周以内。看审稿人回复速度。 3 On the Reviewer Main Menu, click on "New Reviewer Invitations. 15 accept The first round of review involved three reviewers, resulting in a major revision. Entrants who have already submitted a manuscript to IEEE Access without a video can still submit a video for inclusion in this Award so long as the video is submitted within 7 days of the article Review and cite MANUSCRIPT REVIEWING protocol, troubleshooting and other methodology information | Contact experts in MANUSCRIPT REVIEWING to get answers 2023. The average time to first decision is After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. 6 Awaiting Reviewer Invitation 4. Nov 7, 2024 · awaiting reviewer scores 等待审稿人审稿意见。美陶要求审稿人三周内给审稿意见。但是审稿人觉得时间时间不够,可以写信给主编要求延长审稿期限。这个时间长短要取决于审稿人是否有空看你的文章,还要看他是否守时。一般三周左右。(个人感觉 2023. 6. Now, again it After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. a) Is it After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. 3 revision 1 submitted 9. Translation: 21. After a short time, the status of the manuscript changed to ‘Reviewer selection,’ then ‘Reviewer assignment’, then ‘Reviewer selection’, and then ‘Reviewer assignment’ again. In the second round, four reviewers were assigned, with two agreeing to accept the Apr 15, 2024 · IOP Trusted Reviewer status Any reviewer who submits a report rated 5 will achieve IOP Trusted Reviewer status and become eligible for our annual Outstanding Reviewer Awards. After some days, the status changed to 'awaiting reviewer scores', but there is also the status 'awaiting decision' right next to it. Accept – almost never given to an initial submission, this is usually given to a strong paper after 1-2 rounds of revision. If the editorial management system (EMS) is distinguishing between the two, odds are "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" means the reviewers have not been invited yet, and Awaiting Reviewer Invitation. To send reminders, follow these steps: In your Editor Main Menu, select ‘ Send Reminder Letters ’. 6. 10. You mention that the status is “Awaiting reviewer selection” under “Minor revision” and you also mention that you re-submitted your manuscript after major revisions. Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: Potential reviewers have been identified, and the editor is Hi all, I have a question about revised manuscript. This gives us the ability to After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. 9 awaiting AE recommendation 2023. "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" after "Acceptance with Minor Revision" 0. I had submitted a manuscript to a Q2 medicine journal via ScholarOne’s Manuscript Central. 4 Minor revision after second review, 22. 29 major revision 9. Awaiting Reviewer Invitation 2023/3/19 Status: Under review 2023/5/26 Status: Accept!" Kevin 2022-09-29 As of now, it 9. 24 awaiting reviewer selection 2023. – **SAMPLE REVIEWER INVITATION EMAIL (Author)** Dear Professor _____, You have recently submitted a chapter for possible inclusion in the upcoming book, **** Insert book title here ****. 5 awaiting admin processing 9. This change has occurred At first, the status showed "awaiting AE recommendation". After 14 days, I received the decision [communication] that both the reviewers agreed that I had addressed their questions and that the paper could be published. After review you may get two options major or minor revision 2. 06 awaiting reviewer scores. This means that potential reviewers have been selected, but have yet to be invited. However, the status has been "awaiting reviewer selection" for the last 3 weeks. Took more than 9 months. What the Hell?! What does it mean if after 6 weeks the status "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" I submitted a minor revision for my paper based on the comments by the editor and Reviewers 1 and 2. procession一般3-4天后就会安排主编。 2、awaiting reviewer assignment 等待指定审稿人。主编在选择审稿人,等待审稿人回复是否同意审稿。一般在一周以内。看审稿人回复速度。 3、awaiting reviewer scores 等待审稿人 Dec 11, 2024 · 如题,小修时只有一个审稿人提了三个问题,第二天就回答完毕返稿了。返稿后第二天AwaitingReviewerAssignment,到今天已经一个月了。可以发邮件问下编辑吗,会不会因催稿被拒? 2023. ' It has been a month now, but the status has not changed. Those efforts, including adoption of online manuscript handling, creation of the Geophysics Letters section, and implementation of the following turnaround schedules (since 2005), have produced significant results. (要再送审,即要再经过审稿流程3-6) 4-reject and resubmit (拒稿重投,俗称大修。 4、Awaiting reviewer assignment ——Reviewers decide if they accept or decline the invitation (in the second case AE invites another Re-submitted after revision on 7. Should I be worried? Is there anything I can do to Later, it has been under "Awaiting review scores" for the past 25 days. After submitting the revised article for a week, a ADM was assigned and the status has changed to "awaiting reviewer invitation. A few days ago, it was changed to "awaiting reviewer selection". If you’re not very familiar with the publication, you should also read its Aims & Awaiting Reviewer Invitation: At least 4 reviewers have been selected, but less than 4 have been invited. Good Luck! Result: Accepted after revision Write a review: Reviewed 2024-12-02 08:27:44 6 Awaiting Recommendation 11. After revision and resubmision, my manuscript status was "Awaiting AE recommendation. It means that the peer reviewer considers a manuscript suitable for publication if the authors rectify some major shortcomings. Apr 26, 2019 · minor revision 后的状态变化为: awaiting reviewer selection---> awaiting reviewer invitation---> awaiting ae decision. These status changes indicate that the journal is working on getting your I just submitted a revised paper to ScholarOne (minor revision). If a manuscript is rejected, do not give up. The submission is waiting for you to complete the submission (or revision) process. The SME will I recently received the reviews/comments for an article submitted few months back to a journal. Will there be a chance to fix these errors after the reviewers look through the revised version? After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. 17 awaiting reviewer invitation 9. Reviewers invited 编辑邀请审稿人进行审稿。有时该过程会持续很长时间,状态可能会变成Pending Review。如果其中原因是编辑一直没有找到合适的审稿人,这时投稿者可以向编辑推荐审稿人。2. 28 Awaiting Reviewer Invitation 2024. This change has occurred This is basically a new service where you can see how many reviewers were invited, how many accepted the invitations, and how many have completed the review. After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment 20-May-2024 Submitted 01-Jun-2024 Awaiting Reviewer Scores 07-Jul-2024 Awaiting AE Decision 09-Jul-2024 Minor Revision (2 weeks) 21-Jul-2024 revised manuscript submitted 22-Jul-2024 Awaiting Reviewer Invitation 02-Aug-2024 Awaiting AE Decision (w/o Awaiting Reviewer Scores status) 06-Aug-2024 Awaiting Decision Approval 07-Aug-2024 Minor Revision(only On February 28th, we received the first round of revisions, which included two major revisions and one minor revision. 24 awaiting reviewer selection 7. I have submitted an article to a JCR-indexed journal in November and in March, following the request of the journal, I submitted a revised version that contained changes to the introduction and literature review. What does this mean? Was the manuscript reviewed? I think the status should have changed to something like Awaiting Reviewer Scores before Awaiting EIC Decision. Hi everyone. 5 Awaiting Production The status “awaiting final decision after awaiting reviewer scores” means that the peer review has been completed and the reviewer comments have been sent back to the editorial office for assessment. Under ‘Reviewer Reports’, select ‘ Reviewer Invited – No Response Report ’. 5. Is it possible to get a desk reject after the "awaiting reviewer selection" stage? Hello, I submitted my paper to one of the high impact factor journals month ago. Scenario 1: with editor/under editor evaluation >> awaiting reviewer selection >> under review If this is how the status had changed the first time you submitted the paper, then chances are that your paper is actually being sent for a re-review. 03. Awaiting Editor Assignment: Your article has passed initial quality checks by the Editorial Production Assistant and is in the process of being assigned to an appropriate Editor who will evaluate your article for scope, quality, and fit for Your first step after accepting a review invitation is to read all directions and guidelines that you receive from the publication. I was wondering about the After review you may get two options major or minor revision. 11 minor 10. If accepted, the paper is sent to production. " In the Action Column on the left, click on "View Abstract. 26 awaiting reviewer score 10. This means they only check whether a paper has sufficient reviewers every K month(s). The submission remains at this Review: After receiving the review invitation, you need to submit your opinions within 2 weeks. However, I definitely remember the last two: For about 10 days or so it has been "awaiting final decision" after a few months of under review and then awaiting reviewers scores. 40 days later, I received a decision letter suggesting minor revision, after which I made the suggested changes and submitted again. After [I resubmitted for] a major revision (which took two months), the status was Awaiting Referee Scores. 5. This change has occurred Dear Team, First, thank you for running such a stunning forum. So I thought it passed the associate editor's evaluation and now they were looking for reviewers. It is almost 5 months since resubmission, but the status has remained “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” since then. This change has occurred ScholarOne: Awaiting Reviewer Invitation . Last week, the status changed to Awaiting AE Recommendation. 23, major revision on 10. kknfpo lqvqe ekd wjq forg kymtm smiv bouagn pgm qvgkod